MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293066935 · doi:10.1063/5.0102588

Electron transport with the McKelvey–Shockley flux method: The effect of electric field and electron–phonon scattering

2022· article· en· W4293066935 on OpenAlexafffund
Qinxin Zhu, Jesse Maassen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBoltzmann equationElectric fieldElectronPhysicsPhononScatteringComputational physicsCondensed matter physicsBoltzmann constantStatistical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The McKelvey–Shockley (McK–S) flux method is a semi-classical transport theory that captures ballistic and non-equilibrium effects and can treat carrier flow from the nano-scale to the macro-scale. This work introduces a revised formulation of the McK–S flux equations for electron transport, in order to resolve the energy dependence of the fluxes, capture the effect of electric field, and include acoustic/optical phonon scattering. This updated McK–S formalism is validated by simulating electron transport across a finite-length semiconductor under the influence of a constant electric field under varying conditions, from ballistic to diffusive and from near-equilibrium to non-equilibrium, and benchmarked against solutions of the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE). The McK–S results display good agreement with those of the BTE, including the directed fluxes and heating profiles, with the electron density showing larger differences when far from equilibrium. Compared to other more rigorous techniques, the McK–S flux method is physically intuitive and computationally efficient and, thus, well suited to treat systems that are complex and/or span multiple length scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207