Preliminary Study on the Effect of Adding Palm Tree Fronds toConcrete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agriculture waste can be used in construction as an alternative to non-environmentally friendly components. Every year, a considerable amount of this waste is thrown without any recycling. In addition to its good tensile properties, natural fibers such as the ones extracted from palm tree fronds (PTF), can be used to enhance the thermal properties of concrete. The consistent increase in the planet temperature, increases the demands for AC usage and electricity consumption. This implies more CO2 emissions and consequently more temperature rise. In this study, the concept of using this free natural waste in construction has been investigated. This paper is concerned with the use of PTF with concrete as a composite material. The tests that have been carried out on the PTF concrete (PTFC) are focused on the strength and durability of the composite material. Four PTFC mixes where prepared and casted into cylindrical molds for tests at several curing ages. The results indicate some improvement in the thermal resistance of concrete on the cost of its mechanical properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it