Buckling Analysis of Cylindrical Steel Fuel Storage Tanks under Static Forces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developing sustainable fuel containers to store energy resources is essential because of the worldwide energy crisis. The sustainability of fuel storage tanks is more necessary than any other infrastructure because of its contents' toxic and inflammable nature. The primary design problem that requires full attention is the prevention of buckling and large magnitude displacement against static and dynamic forces. A detailed analytical program is needed to evaluate the buckling strength of fuel storage tanks. Initially, as a starting point, a simple axial linear buckling analysis of an empty steel cylindrical storage tank with different H/D and R/t ratio are considered for the present work. To cover all ranges of steel cylindrical fuel storage tanks (i.e., short, medium, and tall), twelve sizes were selected from the literature with diameter to thickness (D/t) ratios of 1000, 1500, and 2000 and the height to diameter (H/D) ratios of 0.5,1,1.5 and 2.0. This study used two commercially available software, ABAQUS 6.5 and ANSYS workbench 2021. The results are compared with the theoretical axial buckling stress equation. Finite Elements results obtained from both software showed good agreement with the theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".