MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293084412 · doi:10.1177/09544062221106288

A new higher-order shear deformation theory for frequency analysis of functionally graded porous plates

2022· article· en· W4293084412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePorosityFunctionally graded materialDimensionless quantityShear modulusMechanicsGalerkin methodMaterial propertiesPlate theoryComposite materialVirtual workModulusPorous mediumFinite element methodStructural engineeringBoundary value problemMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current investigation aims to account for the influence of porosity modeling while studying the dynamic response of functionally graded material (FGM) plates within the framework of a new, higher-order shear deformation theory for the first time. In the newly developed porosity modeling, the reciprocal effect of mass density and Young’s modulus is considered. Furthermore, silicon carbide in the ceramic phase and nickel in the metallic phase are selected as the constituent materials of the functionally graded plate. Based upon the new higher-order theory, the kinetic and kinematic relations are derived. This theory does not need any shear correction factor. The dynamic form of the principle of virtual work is employed to achieve governing equations of structure. Afterward, Galerkin’s method is implemented to solve obtained governing equations of porous, functionally graded plates. In order to verify the accuracy of the method, the obtained results were compared with the results reported in the literature, and good agreement was found. At last, the influences of some parameters such as porosity coefficient, length to thickness ratio, and aspect ratio of the porous, FGM plate on the dimensionless frequency are studied and the results are illustrated in detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it