MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hybrid Multi-Dimensional Modulation in Non-Orthogonal Spatial-Delay-Doppler Domains for Beyond 5G, and 6G Communications

2022· article· en· W4293094787 on OpenAlexaff
Thakshanth Uthayakumar, Jie Mei, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference: (VTC2022-Spring) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonalityOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingMIMOComputer scienceElectronic engineeringModulation (music)Spectral efficiencyMIMO-OFDMMulti-user MIMOChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsPhysicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joint utilization of orthogonal radio resources from multiple domains such as spatial, time-frequency, and delay-doppler domains has become an important paradigm to support diverse QoS requirements (higher datarate, higher spectral efficiency, and low latency) in beyond 5G, and 6G. However, due to higher carrier frequency (mmWave) communication with closely packed massive MIMO antennas, and high-speed mobility in future wireless channels, severe non-orthogonal interferences are dynamically induced in multiple domains which dramatically deteriorate the communication datarate of current OFDM systems. In high speed mobility scenarios, orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation scheme achieves better communication performance than OFDM at higher modulation cost. Based on these observations, this paper is motivated to propose a novel, situation-aware, cost efficient, switched modulation in spatial, time-frequency, and delay-doppler domains termed hybrid multi-dimensional modulation (H-MDM) scheme that jointly optimizes the radio resource separation to minimize the non-orthogonality degree in each domain, and thus achieves maximized communication datarate under dynamically varying non-orthogonality conditions in those domains. Simulation results validate that the proposed H-MDM achieves maximized datarate compared to state-of-art MIMO-OFDM, and MIMO-OTFS systems under such randomly varying non-orthogonality conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the proposed H-MDM scheme is highly advantageous for high speed mobility, and massive MIMO communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference: (VTC2022-Spring)Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207