Intrinsic connectivity of the human brain provides scaffold for tau aggregation in clinical variants of Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) phenotypes might result from differences in selective vulnerability. Evidence from preclinical models suggests that tau pathology has cell-to-cell propagation properties. Therefore, here, we tested the cell-to-cell propagation framework in the amnestic, visuospatial, language, and behavioral/dysexecutive phenotypes of AD. We report that each AD phenotype is associated with a distinct network-specific pattern of tau aggregation, where tau aggregation is concentrated in brain network hubs. In all AD phenotypes, regional tau load could be predicted by connectivity patterns of the human brain. Furthermore, regions with greater connectivity displayed similar rates of longitudinal tau accumulation in an independent cohort. Connectivity-based tau deposition was not restricted to a specific vulnerable network but was rather a general property of brain organization, linking selective vulnerability and transneuronal spreading models of neurodegeneration. Together, this study indicates that intrinsic brain connectivity provides a framework for tau aggregation across diverse phenotypic manifestations of AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".