A Novel Coupling Model of Physiological Degradation and Emotional State for Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease Progression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression plays a very important role in the early intervention of patients and the improvement of life quality. Cognitive scales are commonly used to assess the patient's status. However, due to the complicated pathogenesis of AD and the individual differences in AD, the prediction of AD progression is challenging. This paper proposes a novel coupling model (P-E model) that takes into account the processes of physiological degradation and emotional state transition of AD patients. We conduct experiments on synthetic data to validate the effectiveness of the proposed P-E model. Next, we conduct experiments on 134 subjects with more than 10 follow-ups from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The prediction performance of the P-E model is significantly better than other state-of-the-art methods, which achieves the mean squared error of 7.137 ± 0.035. The experimental results show that the P-E model can well characterize the non-monotonic properties of AD cognitive data and can also have a good predictive ability for time series data with individual differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".