MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293105950 · doi:10.1002/ggn2.202200016

GA4GH Phenopackets: A Practical Introduction

2022· article· en· W4293105950 on OpenAlexaff
Markus S. Ladewig, Julius O.B. Jacobsen, Alex H. Wagner, Daniel Daniš, Bahá El Kassaby, Michael Gargano, Tudor Groza, Michael Baudis, Robin Steinhaus, Dominik Seelow, Nikolaos E. Bechrakis, Chris Mungall, Paul N. Schofield, Olivier Elemento, Lindsay Smith, Julie A. McMurry, Mónica Muñoz-Torres, Melissa Haendel, Peter N. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Genetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthAlan Turing Institute
KeywordsSuiteSchema (genetic algorithms)DiseaseMedical diagnosisGenomicsComputer scienceData scienceHealth careData sharingAllianceClinical phenotypeComputational biologyBioinformaticsMedicinePhenotypeGenomeBiologyInformation retrievalGeneticsPathologyAlternative medicineGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) is developing a suite of coordinated standards for genomics for healthcare. The Phenopacket is a new GA4GH standard for sharing disease and phenotype information that characterizes an individual person, linking that individual to detailed phenotypic descriptions, genetic information, diagnoses, and treatments. A detailed example is presented that illustrates how to use the schema to represent the clinical course of a patient with retinoblastoma, including demographic information, the clinical diagnosis, phenotypic features and clinical measurements, an examination of the extirpated tumor, therapies, and the results of genomic analysis. The Phenopacket Schema, together with other GA4GH data and technical standards, will enable data exchange and provide a foundation for the computational analysis of disease and phenotype information to improve our ability to diagnose and conduct research on all types of disorders, including cancer and rare diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced GeneticsSame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207