MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293113143 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2022/51079.16766

Efficacy of Open versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises on Dynamic Balance and Health Status in Individuals with Osteoarthritis of Knee Joint: A Quasi-experimental Study

2022· article· en· W4293113143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisWOMACMedicinePhysical therapyKnee JointBalance (ability)Dynamic balancePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoarthritis is an inflammatory disorder characterised by changes in the biomechanics, biochemistry and genetic background of joint cartilage and subchondral bone. When distal parts move freely throughout exercises in a weight-bearing position, the phrase open kinetic exercises is employed. Closed kinetic exercises are employed in a weight-bearing position when the body travels through a hard and quick distal phase. Aim: To compare the efficacy of Open Kinetic Chain (OKC) and Closed Kinetic Chain (CKC) exercises on dynamic balance and health status in individuals with osteoarthritis of knee joint. Materials and Method: A single-blinded experimental study was conducted from April 2020 to May 2021 at Dr D.Y. Patil college of Physiotherapy, Pimpri-Chinchwad area, Pune, Maharashtra, India. A sample of 30 subjects with unilateral osteoarthritis of knee joint, between the age of 40-60 years of both genders, were recruited. They were divided into open kinetic group (Group A) and closed kinetic group (Group B) using convenient sampling method. Y-balance and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) (Pune CRD version) were used as outcome measures-preintervention, post two weeks and post four weeks of intervention. Data normality was tested by Shapiro-wilk test. Significance was tested using paired t-test within the groups for WOMAC and Y-balance test. Unpaired t-test was used between the groups. Results: Among 30 subjects, 17 were males and 13 females. There was a significant improvement in dynamic balance (p-value=0.001) and WOMAC (p-value=0.001) in both the groups. In group A, preintervention mean values for WOMAC was 41.2±10.53, and post four weeks of intervention it was 34.53±10.12 (p-value=0.001). Preintervention mean for Y-balance test was 0.554±14.6 and after four weeks of intervention mean was 0.586±13.8 (p-value <0.001). In group B, preintervention mean for WOMAC was 40.87±8.33, and after four weeks of intervention, mean was 30.47±7.22 (p-value=0.001); while preintervention mean for Y-balance test was 0.583±7.8 and after four weeks of intervention, mean was 0.645±7.0 (p-value=0.001). Between groups, analysis showed p-value=0.051 for both groups post four weeks of intervention. Conclusion: The study concluded that CKC exercises are more effective than OKC exercises in improving dynamic balance and decrease in pain, stiffness, and improving physical function in knee osteoarthritis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it