MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293115961 · doi:10.11159/icmie22.124

Path Planning with Modified RRT* Algorithm for Lung Biopsy

2022· article· en· W4293115961 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuexi Dong, Kunpeng Wang, S.C. Fok, Han Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
KeywordsComputer sciencePath (computing)Motion planningLungAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMedicineRobotInternal medicineOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Path planning plays a central role in robot-assisted percutaneous insertion. The main challenge of path planning exists in the motion constraints inherited from the geometry and mechanics of the needle, and the complex anatomic environment of human body. In nonholonomic planning, the classic Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees (RRT) algorithm may fail to provide a continuous and obstacleavoidable path. To find a feasible path and minimize the damage on soft tissues based on a newly-introduced curvature-controllable steerable needle, we propose a method that utilizes RRT* and quadratic Bezier curve smoothing technique. RRT* with Bezier Curve Smoothing can generate a path composed of smooth piecewise planar curves with continuous connections. Comparisons are employed to show that our method generates shorter and less torturous paths with a higher success rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207