MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293115961 · doi:10.11159/icmie22.124

Path Planning with Modified RRT* Algorithm for Lung Biopsy

2022· article· en· W4293115961 on OpenAlex
Yuexi Dong, Kunpeng Wang, S.C. Fok, Han Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
KeywordsComputer sciencePath (computing)Motion planningLungAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMedicineRobotInternal medicineOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Path planning plays a central role in robot-assisted percutaneous insertion. The main challenge of path planning exists in the motion constraints inherited from the geometry and mechanics of the needle, and the complex anatomic environment of human body. In nonholonomic planning, the classic Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees (RRT) algorithm may fail to provide a continuous and obstacleavoidable path. To find a feasible path and minimize the damage on soft tissues based on a newly-introduced curvature-controllable steerable needle, we propose a method that utilizes RRT* and quadratic Bezier curve smoothing technique. RRT* with Bezier Curve Smoothing can generate a path composed of smooth piecewise planar curves with continuous connections. Comparisons are employed to show that our method generates shorter and less torturous paths with a higher success rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it