MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293116030 · doi:10.11159/htff22.140

Correlation Between Wall Heat Transfer And Characteristics Of Pulsating Flow In A Rectangular Tube Toward An Automobile Exhaust System

2022· article· en· W4293116030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuki Kato, Guanming Guo, Masaya Kamigaki, Kenmei Fujimoto, Mikimasa KAWAGUCHI, Keiya Nishida, Hitoshi Hongou, Masanobu Koutoku, Hideaki Yokohata, Shinji Sumi, Ryo Yamamoto, Yoichi Ogata

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTube (container)Heat transferMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study is to investigate experimentally the effect of pulsation frequency on the heat transfer characteristics and the mechanism of the pulsation flow, which is representative of the operating conditions of the engine exhaust flow.The experimental apparatus consists of a rotating disk with holes that converts steady hot air flow rate into a pulsating flow to exchange heat energy with external air.The fluid temperature is measured by thermocouples, and the wall temperature is measured by thermography.It is found that heat transfer enhancement due to pulsation does not occur at frequencies below 25 Hz, even though the velocity amplitude is large.In order to investigate the cause of this phenomenon, the flow field is measured by PIV(Particle Image Velocimetry) and the turbulent kinetic energy is evaluated.It is clarified that the turbulent kinetic energy near the wall is small at frequencies below 30 Hz, despite the large velocity amplitude.From the time series of velocity data, it was observed that the turbulence is extremely small during the acceleration phase of the fluid.As a result, the turbulent mixing during the acceleration phase is suppressed, and the time-averaged turbulent kinetic energy becomes small, which is thought to have suppressed heat transfer enhancement.This is the first attempt to experimentally link heat transfer and flow structure fluctuations in a pulsating flow, which is achieved by unsteady measurement of the flow field using PIV and calculation of the turbulent kinetic energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicCyclone Separators and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207