Thermodynamics of Formation and Evaporation of Aluminum andAluminum Telluride Melts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the values of aluminum telluride vapor pressure determined by the boiling point method and aluminum found by integration, the partial and integral thermodynamic functions of formation and evaporation of the aluminum-telluride system melts have been calculated.The vapor pressure of aluminum telluride ( ) above the melting point has been determined for the first time.Integral functions of alloys mixing have a maximum (entropy -5.23±0.31J/(mol-K), enthalpy -4.17±0.24kJ/mol) at monotectic corresponding to 42 -44 at.% Te in the melt.The formation of alloys is accompanied by an increase in disorder in the system and goes with heat absorption.Integral functions of evaporation monotonically decrease from aluminum to telluride, and the entropy of evaporation Al 2 Te 3 (60.71±3.37J/(mol×K)) indirectly confirms the congruent nature of aluminum telluride evaporation.The state diagram is supplemented with the fields of melt and vapor co-consistency at atmospheric pressure and in a vacuum of 6.67 kPa, which testify to the possibility of distillation separation of the Al -Al 2 Te 3 system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".