Bibliographic record
Abstract
La notion algonquienne de « manitou » embrouille les anthropologues depuis ses premières mentions au sein de la discipline. Au fil de ces débats, la notion de manitu a été comprise soit comme une classe d’entité, un pouvoir diffus présent partout dans la nature, ou encore comme une notion plus générale encore que le sacré, bref en termes essentiellement magico-religieux. Au contraire, manitu apparaît comme un concept intégrateur qui anime et fonde la cohérence des cosmologies algonquiennes, concept que les auteurs proposent ici de concevoir comme une règle ultime. Cet article met de l’avant que la notion de manitu gagne à être analysée de pair avec celle d’entité-maître. Ces deux notions sont aux fondements de la juridicité algonquienne en ce qu’elles expriment l’idée d’une puissance qui est cause d’elle-même et qui régule les relations des êtres humains avec les existants du cosmos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".