Leisure’s relation to older adults adapting to new homes: A scoping review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the global population ages, older adults may move to new homes, experiencing changes in their social and physical environments. Leisure has been linked to adjusting to these changes by promoting maintenance of identity and socialization. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize literature regarding leisure’s relation to older adults’ adaptation to new homes. Findings suggest leisure is linked to adaptation to new homes by providing a sense of continuity, belonging and connection. Additionally, the physical, institutional and social environments of the new home can facilitate or hinder leisure participation. This review adds to the discussion of leisure’s inter-relationships with sense of home and identity of older adults moving to new homes. This review suggests practitioners, residence planners and policy makers can develop strategies that help older adults maintain social networks and leisure opportunities following transitions into new environments. This review identified gaps and areas for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it