MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293147411 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2022.3186596

Mode Transitions and Thickness Measurements During Deposition of Nanoscale TiO<sub>2</sub> Coatings on Tilted Fiber Bragg Gratings

2022· article· en· W4293147411 on OpenAlexafffund
J. J. Imas, Jacques Albert, Ignacio Del Villar, Aritz Ozcáriz, Carlos R. Zamarreño, Ignacio R. Matı́as

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsMaterials scienceCladding (metalworking)Refractive indexOpticsCoatingLong-period fiber gratingOptical fiberFiber Bragg gratingWavelengthAtomic layer depositionMulti-mode optical fiberThin filmFiberOptoelectronicsFiber optic sensorGraded-index fiberComposite materialNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mode transition is a phenomenon observed in thin film coated long period fiber gratings (LPGs) and single-mode multimode single-mode (SMS) fibers for certain values of the coating thickness and refractive index, resulting in increased sensitivity for sensing applications. It is shown here that mode transitions occur simultaneously for a large number of mode resonances in the transmission spectra of tilted fiber Bragg gratings (TFBG) measured during the deposition of ∼350 nm thick TiO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> coatings by Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD). In TFBGs, the mode transition shows up as an acceleration of the resonance wavelength shift vs thickness, but without fading of the resonance amplitude. Furthermore, the results show that the mode transition for cladding modes with predominantly “TE” polarization at the cladding boundary is significantly sharper than that of predominantly “TM” polarized modes and that it occurs at a smaller coating thickness (<100 nm vs >200 nm). Finally, using a separately determined coating refractive index (2.14, by ellipsometry on witness flats deposited simultaneously) and simulations of the resonance shifts of the TFBG with coating thickness, it is demonstrated that a TFBG connected to a spectral interrogation system can be used to measure the growth of a coating on the surface of the fiber in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207