El T-MEC y la tercera generación de arreglos laborales: De las experiencias previas en Latinoamérica al futuro previsible para las relaciones industriales mexicanas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En Norteamérica existe un nuevo marco normativo dirigido a replantear los términos de intercambio comercial entre Canadá, México y Estados Unidos, y a incidir en sus relaciones laborales. El estudio se dirige a evaluar las condiciones como se está produciendo el tránsito hacia un nuevo modelo laboral en México, partiendo de la experiencia previa y seis acuerdos comerciales de Estados Unidos con 11 países de América Latina y el Caribe. La evidencia reunida muestra que los cambios hasta ahora producidos son limitados y focalizados en industrias estratégicas trasnacionales como la automotriz. Se postula entonces que sólo ocurrirá una transformación de las relaciones laborales si y solo si los cambios legislativos son respaldados y procesados por los diferentes stakeholders involucrados –i.e., una orquestación desde abajo que pueda extenderse y ser respaldada por la sociedad civil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".