A ÉTICA DA AUTENTICIDADE E SUAS CONSEQUÊNCIAS PARA A QUALIDADE DA DEMOCRACIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O que o filósofo canadense Charles Taylor chamou de ética da autenticidade foi o deslocamento do acento moral do geral para o particular. Assim sendo, fala-se de um significado moral independente e crucial para formar seres humanos verdadeiros e completos segundo a lógica do mundo atual. Este estudo compõe-se de uma pesquisa bibliográfica por meio da qual pretende demonstrar as consequências dessa nova forma de eticidade para o funcionamento dos regimes ditos democráticos, vez que, estes carecem bem mais do que o voto para um bom funcionamento das instituições públicas. Logo, se uma das características desse modelo ético é, exatamente, uma sociedade fragmentada, onde as inciativas dizem respeito apenas a interesses individuais ou corporativos, cresce – cada vez mais – o sentimento de que o eleitorado é indefeso contra o Estado que não é mais democrático, mas transvestido por um “despotismo suave”.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".