MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293161076 · doi:10.4000/rhcf.2859

La reconfiguration des chemins de fer d’Alsace-Lorraine en vue de la Première Guerre mondiale (1871-1919)

2018· article· fr· W4293161076 on OpenAlexaff
Joël Forthoffer

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d’histoire des chemins de fer · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après la guerre de 1870, les chemins de fer des régions annexées passent sous administration allemande. La direction générale impériale des chemins de fer en Alsace-Lorraine va alors être le lieu des premières unifications techniques dans les chemins de fer allemands. Elle se voit dotée d’un réseau moderne et extrêmement dense, répondant aussi bien à des impératifs de développement industriel, commercial que stratégiques. Jusqu’à la veille de la Première Guerre mondiale, c’est la période où près de 514 gares et haltes sont construites avec leurs architectures caractéristiques et imposantes pour marquer la présence allemande. Pendant la Première Guerre mondiale et surtout les premiers mois, les bâtiments, voies, installations ferroviaires et ouvrages situé le long de la ligne de front subissent d’importants dégâts. Durant cette période, le matériel roulant est très sollicité et manque d’entretien. À la fin de la guerre, l’Alsace et la Moselle réintègrent le territoire français et la Compagnie des chemins de fer l’Alsace et de Lorraine est créée par arrêté du 19 juin 1919.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d’histoire des chemins de ferSame topicUrbanism, Landscape, and Tourism StudiesFrench-language works237,207