Review of Capillary Rise Experiments for Surface-Active Solutes in the Subsurface
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surface-active solutes that exist in the subsurface either naturally (humic acid) or as a result of anthropogenic activities (alcohols, surfactants, PFAS) alter the hydraulic and geotechnical properties of the unsaturated porous media. The alteration of properties is the result of concentration-dependent surface tension, and/or density, and the contact angle effects. These effects are manifested in the form of changes in water retention and conduction and changes in the suction component of the shear strength. Differences in the spatial distribution of these solutes in the subsurface result in capillary pressure gradients causing flow perturbations. Conceptual and numerical models to understand the effects of these solutes require concentration-dependent consideration of surface tension, density, and the contact angle effects on hydraulic and geotechnical properties of porous media. Capillary rise experiments have been carried out to either quantify the effect of surface-active solutes on the height of capillary rise or to determine the concentration-dependent contact angle changes due to salinity of the pore water. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the literature on capillary rise experiments and how they can potentially be used to characterize the hydraulic and geotechnical properties of unsaturated porous media affected by surface-active solutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it