MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293187703 · doi:10.37394/232020.2022.2.13

The Sigmoid Neural Network Activation Function and its Connections to Airy’s and the Nield-Kuznetsov Functions

2022· article· en· W4293187703 on OpenAlex
M. H. Hamdan, D. C. Roach

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePROOF · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSigmoid functionAiry functionActivation functionBoundary value problemFunction (biology)Artificial neural networkMathematical analysisMathematicsApplied mathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysis and solution of Airy’s inhomogeneous equation, when its forcing function is the sigmoid neural network activation function, are provided in this work. Relationship between the Nield-Kuznetsov, the Scorer, the sigmoid, the polylogarithm and Airy’s functions are established. Solutions to initial and boundary value problems, when the sigmoid function is involved, are obtained. Computations were carried out using Wolfram Alpha.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it