Quantitative Nuclear Histomorphometry Predicts Molecular Subtype and Clinical Outcome in Medulloblastomas: Preliminary Findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular subtypes of medulloblastoma [Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Wingless/INT (WNT), Group 3, and Group 4] are defined by common patterns of gene expression. These differential gene expression patterns appear to result in different histomorphology and prognosis. Quantitative histomorphometry is a well-known method of computer-aided pathology image analysis. The hypotheses we sought to examine in this preliminary proof of concept study were whether computer extracted nuclear morphological features of medulloblastomas from digitized tissue slide images could independently: (1) distinguish between molecularly determined subgroups and (2) identify patterns within these subgroups that correspond with clinical outcome. Our dataset was composed of 46 medulloblastoma patients: 16 SHH (5 dead, 11 survived), 3 WNT (0 dead, 3 survived), 12 Group 3 (4 dead, 8 survived), and 15 were Group 4 (5 dead, 10 survived). A watershed-based thresholding scheme was used to automatically identify individual nuclei within digitized whole slide hematoxylin and eosin tissue images. Quantitative histomorphometric features corresponding to the texture (variation in pixel intensity), shape (variations in size, roundness), and architectural rearrangement (distances between, and number of connected neighbors) of nuclei were subsequently extracted. These features were ranked using feature selection schemes and these top-ranked features were then used to train machine-learning classifiers via threefold cross-validation to separate patients based on: (1) molecular subtype and (2) disease-specific outcomes within the individual molecular subtype groups. SHH and WNT tumors were separated from Groups 3 and 4 tumors with a maximum area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.7, survival within Group 3 tumors was predicted with an AUC of 0.92, and Group 3 and 4 patients were separated into high- and low-risk groups with p = 0.002. Model prediction was quantitatively compared with age, stage, and histological subtype using univariate and multivariate Cox hazard ratio models. Age was the most statistically significant variable for predicting survival in Group 3 and 4 tumors, but model predictions had the highest hazard ratio value. Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry can be used to study medulloblastoma genetic expression phenotypes as it may distinguish meaningful features of disease pathology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".