A Deep Attentive Multimodal Learning Approach for Disaster Identification From Social Media Posts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microblogging platforms such as Twitter have become indispensable for disseminating valuable information, especially at times of natural and man-made disasters. Often people post multimedia contents with images and/or videos to report important information such as casualties, damages of infrastructure, and urgent needs of affected people. Such information can be very helpful for humanitarian organizations for planning adequate response in a time-critical manner. However, identifying disaster information from a vast amount of posts is an arduous task, which calls for an automatic system that can filter out the actionable and non-actionable disaster-related information from social media. While many studies have shown the effectiveness of combining text and image contents for disaster identification, most previous work focused on analyzing only the textual modality and/or applied traditional recurrent neural network (RNN) or convolutional neural network (CNN) which might lead to performance degradation in case of long input sequences. This paper presents a multimodal disaster identification system that utilizes both visual and textual data in a synergistic way by conjoining the influential word features with the visual features to classify tweets. Specifically, we utilize a pretrained convolutional neural network (e.g., ResNet50) to extract visual features and a bidirectional long-term memory (BiLSTM) network with attention mechanism to extract textual features. We then aggregate both visual and textual features by leveraging a feature fusion approach followed by applying the softmax classifier. The evaluations demonstrate that the proposed multimodal system enhances the performance over the existing baselines including both unimodal and multimodal models by attaining approximately 1% and 7% of performance improvement, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".