MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293230851 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101628

Derivation and culturing of neural stem cells from human embryonic brain tissue

2022· article· en· W4293230851 on OpenAlexafffund
Yujin Suk, Agata Kieliszek, Daniel Mobilio, Chitra Venugopal, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTerry Fox Research InstituteMcMaster University
KeywordsEmbryonic stem cellNeural stem cellBiologyIn vitroHuman brainComputational biologyCell biologyNeuroscienceStem cellGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human neural stem cells (hNSCs) are a valuable tool in brain cancer research since they are used as a normal control for multiple assays, mainly pertaining to toxicity. Here, we present a protocol to safely and successfully derive and culture hNSCs in vitro from human embryonic brain tissue. We describe the steps to dissociate embryonic brain tissue and culture hNSCs, followed by the procedure to expand hNSCs. These cells can be used for downstream applications including RNA-seq and omics studies. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Venugopal et al. (2012b), Bakhshinyan et al. (2019), and Venugopal et al. (2012a).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207