Event-Driven Approach for Monitoring and Orchestration of Cloud and Edge-Enabled IoT Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) has greatly benefited the technological advances of a variety of fields, such as manufacturing and medicine, to name a few. The context surrounding these use cases is, however, often widely different from conventional Cloud Computing and web applications. Cyberphysical environments present us with major concerns and constraints surrounding the resilience of systems, which often rely on critical infrastructure and important workloads to prevent major losses for businesses or even the endangerment of individuals. The supervision of these infrastructures, outside the controlled and relatively safe environment of a datacenter, is therefore one of the major considerations for modern IoT systems. In this paper, we evaluate the core concepts around this thesis and propose an architectural and conceptual approach to improve the monitoring, scalability, and orchestration of IoT systems. We leverage and integrate different solutions inspired by modern IoT practices and the cloud ecosystem to optimize both software and hardware aspects. The solution revolves around an Edge Computing approach, Event-driven communication (MQTT) in the Edge, the orchestration of containerized services using Ku-bernetes and KubeEdge, and Device Twins for the management of physical components. Through development, experiment, and evaluation, we propose an architecture and two complementary fault-tolerance strategies to address synchronization between cloud and edge components and improve the overall resilience of the system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".