MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293238139 · doi:10.32492/idea.v6i1.688

Konsep Diri Dalam Menghadapi Quarter Life Crisis

2022· article· en· W4293238139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIDEA Jurnal Psikologi · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicStudent Stress and Coping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyScale (ratio)GeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to determine the influence of self-concept in facing the quarter life crisis in students. The hypothesis proposed is the influence of self-concept in the face of quarter life crisis in students. The research methodology used is quantitative research.The subjects of this study were 80 students between 19 and 29 years old in the city of Jombang using random sampling on purpose.The research instruments used in this study are the self-concept scale and the quarter life crisis scale. The data analysis used in this study was the correlation of moments produced through the SPSS (Statistical Package For The Social Sciences) program.Hypothesis Test obtained the correlation coefficient rxy = -0.416 with a significant 0.000 (p<0.01). This shows that there is a very significant negative correlation between self-concept and quarter life crisis, that is, the higher the self-concept, the individual does not experience a cquarter life crisis, so the hypothesis that is addressed .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it