MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293240324 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1977082/v1

Pareto technique optimization for 3D NOC architecture

2022· preprint· en· W4293240324 on OpenAlexaff
G Sushma, G. Lakshminarayanan, Seok‐Bum Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInitializationPareto principleBenchmark (surveying)PopulationNetwork topologyMetric (unit)Mathematical optimizationSelection (genetic algorithm)Parallel computingMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Network on-Chip (NoC) – the network-based communication between operational cores and intellectual property cores in a single chip – has been eliciting much interest in recent years. The major barrier to the effective design of NoCs has been high-speed data transfer and connections that are only required when necessary in massively parallel, multi-core, low-power applications. To solve these issues, a new technique called Pareto African Buffalo Optimized Mapping Weighted Directive Graph Theory (PABOMWDGT) is proposed in this study. The suggested method aims to locate efficient operational cores integrated on the device in the shortest time and demonstrate the effectiveness of 3D NoC. In this approach, a selection of IP cores from the benchmark dataset are first listed along with their connections. The mapping approach on the 3D NoC topology is optimized for the African buffalo. Random initialization of the IP cores (also known as buffalos) in the optimization technique's search space is performed. Every IP core in the population is used to estimate the various objective functions. The Pareto function is then examined using the African buffalo optimization technique of Deming Regression. A fitness metric is employed to determine the best fit. The position of the buffalos is updated and the best option is identified when one buffalo's fitness level exceeds that of the other. The process is repeated until the maximum number of iterations is reached. Then, mapping is done based on the probability. It is seen that it takes less time to develop an effective mapping of cores in the 3D NoC architecture. Experimental results show that the proposed PABOMWDGT technology is superior to state-of-art techniques with a 0.74 packet / cycle / IP block throughput, 140 clock cycle delay, and 11 ms computation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207