Linking Eight Decades of Canadian Census Collections.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionLinking the many decades of census data collected during Canada’s settlement allows researchers to investigate the movement patterns of early settlers, changes in regional demographics, and intergenerational mobility. This research leverages new methodologies and previously untranscribed individual attributes to link for the first time Canadian censuses from 1852 to 1921. Objectives and ApproachThis work aims to build upon prior efforts (1871-1901 linking) to link the decennial Canadian censuses spanning from 1852 to 1921. We use a more complete transcription of the censuses, that has recently become available to researchers through The Canadian People’s project. Our approach to this task begins with reproducing the results of previous work using data from this new transcription. From there, we add additional time-invariant individual characteristics as features to our classification model. We also explore newer methodologies designed to leverage household information during the linkage process, with the goal of increasing the linkage rate. ResultsWe describe the differences between the different methodologies we use, and the steps we took to clean and standardize the data. We compare the links produced by the different methodologies in terms of the number of links yielded, their quality (false positive rate), and certain aspects of the bias present in the resulting collections of links. We discuss the challenges and potential approaches to dealing with sections of the population who remain difficult to link. We expect the advancements in record linkage methodologies for historical populations coupled with this more complete transcription of the censuses to offer advantages over prior approaches when linking these censuses. We expect the resulting linked data to offer new insight into Canada during this time period. Conclusions/ImplicationsThe resulting collection of linked data over this time period should characterize approximately three generations of early Canadians. This linked data will be passed on to other researchers and will allow us to better understand the changing experiences of the Canadian population during these early stages of Canada’s development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.019 | 0.047 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".