Fungal endophytes affecting the health and recovery of Long’s Braya (<i>Braya longii</i>) and Fernald’s Braya (<i>Braya fernaldii</i>), endangered endemic species of Newfoundland, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long’s ( Braya longii Fernald) and Fernald’s ( B. fernaldii Abbe) Braya are endemic to the Great Northern Peninsula of Newfoundland, Canada. These herbaceous perennials are endangered due to habitat loss and degradation, as well as ongoing threats from fungal infections and insect herbivory. While recovery plans are being implemented, the identity of pathogenic fungi and their origins remain largely unknown. This study was initiated to describe the associated fungal community and infection symptoms. Plant tissues from three populations were sampled over 5 years yielding 326 fungal isolates identified primarily by nucleotide sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer rDNA region. Isolates included 36 taxa, 16 of which were detected once and 5 detected three times or less. In contrast, 12 taxa were detected across multiple sites, sampling intervals and years. These included two species of Alternaria, Boeremia exigua, closely related species of the Didymellaceae, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium sp., Colletotrichum sp., Stagonosporopsis sp., Pleospora sp., and Truncatella angustata. Some common taxa showed seasonal trends. The isolated fungi included known pathogens of Brassicaceae. The plants in this study frequently showed symptoms indicative of fungal infection and insect herbivory. These findings improve our knowledge of Braya endophyte communities and will inform recovery efforts for these endangered species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".