Quantitative Trend Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Municipal Wastewater Exemplified with Sewershed-Specific COVID-19 Clinical Case Counts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We demonstrate a new methodology for quantitative trend analysis (QTA) to analyze and interpret SARS-CoV-2 RNA wastewater surveillance results concurrently with clinical case data. This demonstration is based on the work completed under the Ontario (Canada) Wastewater Surveillance Initiative (WSI) by two laboratories in four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) at each of four large sewersheds, which were sampled over a 9-month period, along with sewershed-specific clinical case counts. The data from the last 5-months, representing a range of high and low case counts, was used for this demonstration. The QTA integrated clinical and wastewater virus signals, while combining recommendations from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US CDC) and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). The key steps in the QTA consisted of signal normalization with pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), as a fecal biomarker, statistical linear break-point trend analysis and integration of both wastewater virus signal and clinical cases trend results. Using this approach, the wastewater virus and clinical cases trends, direction, and magnitude were clearly identified and provided a unified complementary tool to support public health decisions on a targeted, sewershed-specific basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".