MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293252900 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2022.6.002

Hopfield neural network based on clustering algorithms for solving green vehicle routing problem

2022· article· en· W4293252900 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Serap Ercan Cömert, Harun Reşit Yazg̈an, Gamze Türk

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVehicle routing problemCluster analysisArtificial neural networkComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a result of the rapidly increasing distribution network, the toxic gases emitted by the vehicles to the environment have also increased, thus posing a threat to health. This study deals with the problem of determining green vehicle routes aiming to minimize CO2 emissions to meet customers' demand in a supermarket chain that distributes fresh and dried products. A new method based on clustering algorithms and Hopfield Neural Network is proposed to solve the problem. We first divide the large-size green vehicle routing problem into clusters using the K-Means and K-Medoids algorithms, and then the routing problem for each cluster is found using the Hopfield Neural Network, which minimizes CO2 emissions. A real-life example is carried out to illustrate the performance and applicability of the proposed method. The research concludes that the proposed approach produces very encroaching results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering ComputationsSame topicColor perception and designFrench-language works237,207