Bi-objective optimization of identical parallel machine scheduling with flexible maintenance and job release times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates an identical parallel machine scheduling problem with flexible maintenance and job release times and attempts to optimize two objectives: the minimization of the makespan and total tardiness simultaneously. A mixed-integer programming (MIP) model for solving small-scale instances is presented first, and then a modified NSGA-Ⅱ (M-NSGA-Ⅱ) algorithm is constructed for solving medium- and large-scale instances by incorporating several strategies. These strategies include: (ⅰ) the proposal of a decoding method based on dynamic programming, (ⅱ) the design of dynamic probability crossover and mutation operators, and (ⅲ) the presentation of neighborhood search method. The parameters of the proposed algorithm are optimized by the Taguchi method. Three scales of problems, including 52 instances, are generated to compare the performance of different optimization methods. The computational results demonstrate that the M-NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm obviously outperforms the original NSGA-II algorithm when solving medium- and large-scale instances, although the time taken to solve the instances is slightly longer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it