MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293253938 · doi:10.1109/pst55820.2022.9851964

An Efficient, Verifiable, and Dynamic Searchable Symmetric Encryption with Forward Privacy

2022· article· en· W4293253938 on OpenAlexaff
Khosro Salmani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingServerEncryptionVerifiable secret sharingSymmetric-key algorithmConstruct (python library)Scheme (mathematics)Cloud serverPrivate information retrievalCompleteness (order theory)Security analysisComputer securityCryptographyTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkPublic-key cryptographyOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic Searchable Symmetric Encryption (DSSE) allows a cloud server to perform search queries on a user’s documents while both queries and files are encrypted. It also enables the user to update the corpus efficiently. Recently, the notion of Forward Privacy (FP) was introduced, which guarantees the privacy of a newly added document in the presence of previous queries. However, most of the existing approaches work only with honest-but-curious servers. In these schemes, it is assumed the cloud server follows the prescribed protocols, but due to the untrusted nature of the cloud servers, this assumption does not always hold in practice. Hence, it is essential to design and implement new approaches that verify the results of queries and detect malicious behavior of a cloud server. In this paper, we construct a new forward-private DSSE scheme that efficiently achieves result verifiability. To obtain this goal, along with the search results, the server provides a "proof of work" to demonstrate result completeness. Moreover, our approach support searches and updates efficiently. Finally, the security and practicality of our scheme is demonstrated by providing performance analysis and security proof.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207