Genetic diversity and potential biological control of rubus spectabilis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mycobiota survey was conducted on Vancouver Island and mainland BC to identify potential biocontrol agents of salmonberry.The species, which included 17 isolates of B o t ~t i s cinerea, 3 Phoma argillacea and 1 Septoria rubi, were pathogenic on detached leaves.Greenhouse trials showed P. argillacea induced foliar and stem necrosis on intact plants with an 18-hr leaf wetness period and mycelial inoculum of 2 .6 ~1 0 ~ CFUImL.In a host range test, three conifer species showed seedling tolerance and red raspberry showed initial damage but no cane blight when inoculated with P.argillacea.Salmonbeny DNA was isolated from leaves collected from five widespread populations.RAPD-PCR was used to fingerprint individuals, generating 35 loci with a 75.5% average variability.Diversity within populations was high, with an average heterozygosity of 0.38.Among population differentiation was poor, with an FST of 0.0454; therefore, an average 5.3 migrants per generation is required to maintain this variation.R. spectabilis after 2 1 days .............
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".