MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4293312807 · doi:10.14740/jocmr4802

Urothelial Carcinoma With Pulmonary Tumor Thrombotic Microangiopathy After Chemotherapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma

2022· article· en· W4293312807 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Naomi Shimizu, Takuro Ito, Shuji Sato, Yoshiya Sugiura, Ichiro Tatsuno

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombotic microangiopathyAutopsyChemotherapyRespiratory failureLungLymphomaCause of deathNon-Hodgkin's lymphomaInternal medicineGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment-related second malignancies (SMs) remain a major concern in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). In this report, the autopsy findings of a patient with HL, who was in complete remission after chemotherapy but expired of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy (PTTM) caused by urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis (UCRP), were described. A 78-year-old Japanese man with a history of classical HL developed irreversible heart failure about 2.5 years after chemotherapy. The patient expired shortly after being admitted due to ineffective treatment for heart failure. However, the cause of death was not determined. The patient's autopsy findings revealed UCRP in the left kidney, as well as infiltration around the inferior vena cava and lungs, but no HL recurrence. The primary causes of mortality were respiratory and heart failure due to PTTM. Therefore, it is essential to consider the risk of SMs and search for them in patients with HL after chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→