Transnational families and school investment: fighting against social downgrading through intergenerational social mobility. A comparative and multi-sited analysis of Haitian parenthood in migration (France, United States, Quebec)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research analyzes the project of Haitian migrant parents for the academic success of their children. She considers transnational parenthood and the effects of social downgrading on intergenerational social mobility. She has three goals. First, it analyzes the effects of downgrading on parental investment in children's education. Second, by considering intersectionality in the analysis of care, she looks at parenthood in transnational families. Third, it delves into parents' expectations of (pre)school institutions, the requirements of these institutions and parents' time constraints. It compares the educational system and migration policies of several countries (France, Canada, United States) and the Haitian context. It uses a multi-sited observation and a longitudinal approach. It combines the macro-sociological approach of international comparison with a biographical approach based on life stories. These are life stories of shame for these socially downgraded people, which is also dream stories for the social success of children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".