MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293399429 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1601.05081

Econo- and socio- physics based remarks on the economical growth of the\n World

2016· preprint· W4293399429 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rzoska Agata Angelika

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2016
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Quarter (Canadian coin)CrossoverEconomicsIndex (typography)Product (mathematics)Exponential growthExponential functionEconometricsNeoclassical economicsGeographyMathematicsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that the long term evolution of the Gross Product of the\nWorld after World War II can be well portrayed by the exponential function with\nthe crossover at the year 1973, cinsiding with the Oil Crisis onset. For the\nthe Standard and Poor 500 index the single exponential behavior extends down to\nat least the mid of the nineteen century. It is notable that the detailed\nshort-term insight focused on the last quarter of century revealed the\nemergence of the power like dependence. However, such dependences can be\nintroduced only when taking into account the behavior at reference-baselines\nyears. The possible relationship to the growth/death evolution of\nmicroorganisms is also discussed. The report proposes the new discussion of the\npast and nowadays time of the global economy. It recalls econonophysics and\nsociophysics as disciplines within which the effective parameterization of\ntrends is possible. Finally, possible future trends are discussed.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207