Salt stress alters the spectrum of de novo mutation available to selection during experimental adaptation of <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genetic basis of adaptation is driven by both selection and the spectrum of available mutations. Given that the rate of mutation is not uniformly distributed across the genome and varies depending on the environment, understanding the signatures of selection across the genome is aided by first establishing what the expectations of genetic change are from mutation. To determine the interaction between salt stress, selection, and mutation across the genome, we compared mutations observed in a selection experiment for salt tolerance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to those observed in mutation accumulation (MA) experiments with and without salt exposure. MA lines evolved under salt stress had a single‐nucleotide mutation rate of 1.1×10−9, similar to that of MA lines under standard conditions (9.6×10−10). However, we found that salt stress led to an increased rate of indel mutations, but that many of these mutations were removed under selection. Finally, lines adapted to salt also showed excess clustering of mutations in the genome and the co‐expression network, suggesting a role for positive selection in retaining mutations in particular compartments of the genome during the evolution of salt tolerance. Our study shows that characterizing mutation rates and spectra expected under stress helps disentangle the effects of environment and selection during adaptation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".