MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293439954 · doi:10.17116/jnevro202212208188

Therapy of moderate cognitive impairment and asthenia in patients with cerebrovascular pathology: results of a prospective observational study

2022· article· en· W4293439954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. I. Shvartsman, А. А. Скоромец, С. А. Живолупов, О. В. Курушина, S. M. Karpov, Natalia B. Baranova, M V Nesterova, И. В. Смагина, С. В. Прокопенко, Е.А. Антипенко, Л. Б. Новикова

Bibliographic record

VenueS S Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNootropicObservational studyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMagnetic resonance imagingProspective cohort studyInternal medicineCardiologyPhysical therapyCognitive impairmentRadiologyDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining additional data on the efficacy and safety of the drug Prospekta in the treatment of moderate cognitive impairment (MCI) and asthenia in patients with cerebrovascular disease (CVD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study in more than 40 Russian cities enrolled 232 patients (mean age 61.5±10.0 years) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), asthenia on ongoing basic nootropic therapy. The presence of MCI was confirmed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), asthenia - by 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS). All patients were prescribed the nootropic medication Prospekta 2 tablets 2 times a day for 8 weeks in addition to the therapy they received. Ultrasound Doppler sonography of the main arteries of the head and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain were also assessed. At the end of treatment, the Clinical Global Impression Efficacy Index (CGI-EI) was assessed and the safety of the treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: The baseline severity of cognitive impairment according to the MoCA scale was 21.6 points, severity of asthenia according to the VAS was 6.3 points. According to Doppler flowmetry findings, hemodynamically significant stenosis was revealed in 105 (49.3%) patients, and narrowing of the main vessels without changes in hemodynamic parameters was revealed in 108 (50.7%) patients. According to MRI results, single vascular lesions in the brain matter were detected in 102 (44.0%) patients. The medications with nootropic effect were administered to 144 (62.1%) patients. A positive therapeutic response as improvement of cognitive functions was seen in 93.3% of patients after 8 weeks of taking Prospekta, including 39.4% of patients who had cognitive functions restored to the normal level. No side effects were registered during the observational study. CONCLUSIONS: The nootropic medication Prospekta is effective and safe in treatment of MCI in patients with asthenia with CVD, and improves cognitive function in patients with asthenia with CVD, both in monotherapy and in combination with other nootropic agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueS S Korsakov Journal of Neurology and PsychiatrySame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207