Polarization eigenstates analysis of helically structured thin films
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optical properties of thin films are generally determined by direct photometric quantities. We show that additional insight into the properties of anisotropic thin films can be obtained by computing the polarization eigenstates and eigenvalues of their Jones matrices. We consider helically structured thin films, which display intriguing optical response, such as the circular Bragg resonance. Using numerical simulations and actual measurements, we show that the eigenvectors are mutually orthogonal in most regions of the wavevector space, except near the circular Bragg and the oblique resonances. Special wavevector values, called exceptional points, are found where the Jones matrix becomes defective and its eigenvectors coalesce. Exceptional points are also found in pairs of wavevector values differing only by a sample rotation by π around the direction normal to the sample; this property is shown to arise from Saxton - de Hoop's reciprocity principle, which applies to lossy materials and contains time reversal symmetry, which only applies to lossless materials, as a special case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it