MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293462728 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.075429

Orbital disorder and ordering in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>NaTiSi</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>: <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Si</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Na</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>23</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> NMR study

2022· article· lv· W4293462728 on OpenAlexafffund
Ivo Heinmaa, Riho Rästa, H. J. Silverstein, C. R. Wiebe, Raivo Stern

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundHorizon 2020Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEesti Teadusfondi
KeywordsPhysicsParamagnetismRelaxation (psychology)CrystallographyCondensed matter physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

${\mathrm{NaTiSi}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$ is an exemplary compound, showing an orbital assisted spin-Peierls phase transition at ${T}_{c}=210$ K. We present the results of $^{29}\mathrm{Si}$ and $^{23}\mathrm{Na}$ nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements of ${\mathrm{NaTiSi}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{6}$. The use of magic angle spinning (MAS) techniques unambiguously shows that only one dynamically averaged silicon site can be seen at $T$ $&gt;\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{T}_{c}$. At cooling, the $^{29}\mathrm{Si}$ MAS NMR spectrum shows interesting changes. Immediately below ${T}_{c}$, the spectrum gets very broad. Cooling further, it shows two broad lines of unequal intensities which become narrower as the temperature decreases. Below 70 K, two narrow lines have chemical shifts that are typical for diamagnetic silicates. The hyperfine couplings for the two sites are $^{29}\mathrm{H}$ ${}_{\text{hf}}=7.4$ kOe/${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ and 4.9 kOe/${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$. In the paramagnetic state at high temperature, the spin-lattice relaxation of $^{29}\mathrm{Si}$ was found to be weakly temperature dependent. Below ${T}_{c}$ the Arrhenius-type temperature dependence of the relaxation rate indicates an energy gap $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}$/${\mathrm{k}}_{B}=1000(50)$ K. In the temperature region from 120 to 300 K, the relaxation rate was strongly frequency dependent. At room temperature, we found a power law dependence ${T}_{1}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\propto}\phantom{\rule{3.33333pt}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{L}^{\ensuremath{-}0.65(5)}$. For 70 K $&lt;$ $T$ $&lt;$ 120 K, the relaxation appeared to be nonexponential, which we assigned to a relaxation due to fixed paramagnetic centers. Simulation of the magnetization recovery curve showed activation type temperature dependence of the concentration of these centers. The NMR spectrum of $^{23}\mathrm{Na}$ shows the line with typical shape for the central transition of a quadrupolar nucleus. A small frequency shift of $^{23}\mathrm{Na}$ resonance corresponds to a very small hyperfine coupling $^{23}\mathrm{H}$ ${}_{\text{hf}}=0.32$ kOe/${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$. In addition, at $T$ $&gt;\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{T}_{c}$ the $^{23}\mathrm{Na}$ spectrum shows another Lorentzian shaped resonance which we attribute to the Na sites where the quadrupolar coupling is partly averaged by ionic motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0100.013
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1070.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207