ARC: un programa de agroecología en Portugal y sus códigos culturales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abordamos um movimento agrícola alternativo em Portugal, a CSA (Comunidade que Sustenta a Agricultura), movido pelo Montado do Freixo do Meio (MFM), uma ampla estrutura agrícola e de serviços, localizada no Alentejo. Com o objetivo de examinar os códigos culturais promovidos nesse programa, este estudo se apoiou na Semiótica da Cultura para analisar o repertório cultural dessa entidade. Um estudo de campo e as análises das narrativas expressas em um desdobrável, que divulga essa CSA, fez parte do exercício metodológico. Conferiu-se que o texto cultural dessa comunidade é endossado por discursos que a fortalece na condição de um apoio para uma tribo social, movida pela consonância de alguns princípios, destacando-se o da agroecologia. Na análise se confere que o folder assume uma linguagem alternativa que provoca o consumidor a pensar sobre seu modelo de consumo alimentar, em relação aos ditados no mercado convencional, que é visto pelo grupo como o Outro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".