Fractional Cascade LFC for Distributed Energy Sources via Advanced Optimization Technique Under High Renewable Shares
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unpredictable high renewable shares in standalone microgrid (MG) system with stochastic load demands introduces an unavoidable mismatch among loads and sources. This mismatch directly impacts the system frequency that can be mitigated via applying a suitable load frequency control (LFC) scheme. This brief proposes a maiden attempt of marine predator algorithm (MPA) assisted one plus proportional derivative with filter-fractional order proportional-integral ((1+PDF)-FOPI) controller to obtain the proper power flow management among loads and sources. The investigated MG system consists of a photovoltaic (PV) system, a wind turbine (WT) generator (WTG), and a diesel engine generator (DG) as the distributed energy sources, and an ultracapacitor (UC) and a flywheel are chosen as the energy storage elements (ESEs). Various system nonlinearities such as governor dead-band (GDB) and generation rate constraint (GRC) are also considered reflecting the practical scenario. Five state-of-the-art optimization techniques and three traditional controllers, PID, FOPID, and PI-PD, are vividly compared to assess the proposed scheme’s performance. The parametric uncertainties are considered to obtain the robust performance of the proposed control scheme. An eigenvalues-based stability evaluation of the considered plant employing the proposed LFC scheme is also included in this work. In the worst situation, the maximum frequency deviation is obtained as -0.016 Hz, which is entirely satisfactory and under the range of the IEEE standard. Finally, a modified New England IEEE-39 test bus system is chosen to perform the real-time validation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".