MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293503129

Freedom of assembly from a comparative perspective

2017· preprint· fr· W4293503129 on OpenAlexaff
Aurélie Duffy, Thomas Perroud, Olivier Le Bot, Karine Roudier, Charlotte Denizeau, Hubert Alcaraz, Olivier Lecucq, Lucie Lemonde, Grenfieth de Jesús Sierra Cadena

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Computer scienceArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contributions au colloque international organisé dans le cadre de la Chaire Louis Favoreu tenu le 18 mars 2016 à la faculté de droit et de science politique d’Aix-en-Provence sous la direction d’Aurélie Duffy-Meunier, Maître de conférences à l’Université Paris II-Panthéon-Assas et de Thomas Perroud, Professeur à l’Université Paris II — Panthéon-Assas, avec les participations de Hubert Alcaraz et Olivier Lecucq, Charlotte Denizeau, Olivier Le Bot, Lucie Lemonde, Karine Roudier, Grenfieth de J. Sierra Cadena.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207