MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293508740 · doi:10.1109/ojcas.2022.3197333

An Efficient Filter-Bank Multi-Carrier System for High-Speed Wireline Applications

2022· article· en· W4293508740 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeremy Cosson-Martin, Hossein Shakiba, Ali Sheikholeslami

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersScience and Engineering Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsWirelineFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceFilter bankElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an efficient multi-carrier system that combines filter-bank multi-carrier signalling, decision-directed channel estimation, and frequency-domain timing recovery to eliminate the overhead associated with cyclic prefix, large side-lobes, and pilot carriers. Furthermore, a technique is proposed to halve the required number of FFTs (IFFTs), reducing their complexity by 29% for a 32-point resolution; a method is proposed to correct tilt and stretch distortion; and a gain controller with adaptive loop coefficients is adopted to achieve the same stability but 65% higher tracking bandwidth regardless of the FFT size. The concept is validated at the system level, where impairments are applied, enabling an in-depth comparison to conventional discrete multi-tone signalling. Assuming a 32-point FFT, a 35dB channel, and an overlap factor of 3, results show 101% improvement in capacity, 100% improvement in power efficiency, and 101% improvement in area efficiency, and all while maintaining comparable latency. This work enables very low-resolution multi-carrier schemes, which were previously impractical due to the significant overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Circuits and SystemsSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207