Precision neuroimaging biomarkers for bipolar disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe mental illness associated with alterations in brain organization. Neuroimaging studies have generated a large body of knowledge regarding brain morphological and functional abnormalities in BD. Current advances in the field have focussed on the need for more precise neuroimaging biomarkers. Here we present a selective overview of precision neuroimaging biomarkers for BD, focussing on personalized metrics and novel neuroimaging methods aiming to provide mechanistic insights into the brain alterations associated with BD. The evidence presented covers (a) machine learning techniques applied to neuroimaging data to differentiate patients with BD from healthy individuals or other clinical groups; (b) the 'brain-age-gap-estimation (brainAGE), which is an individualized measure of brain health; (c) diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI), neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) techniques that open new opportunities to measure microstructural changes in neurite/synaptic integrity and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".