MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293553223 · doi:10.14740/jh1033

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in a Patient With Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2022· article· en· W4293553223 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rosalyn Marar, Sruti Prathivadhi-Bhayankaram, Mridula Krishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosisPembrolizumabPancytopeniaEtoposideNivolumabImmunologyOncologyInternal medicineImmune systemImmunotherapyChemotherapyBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab are novel therapeutics used to treat various advanced malignancies and have been shown to increase patient survival in several studies. However, these drugs have a toxicity profile that ranges from mild side effects such as dermatitis to life-threatening complications. We present a case of pembrolizumab-induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in an 80-year-old patient with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of presumed cutaneous primary. This patient initially presented with weakness and pancytopenia, thought to be immune-related. She developed progressive anemia, after which further workup revealed concern for HLH. She recovered after a course of steroids, tocilizumab, and etoposide. To our knowledge, this patient's course is among a few rare cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-mediated HLH. This case highlights the need for early diagnosis and recognition of HLH as a potential toxicity related to ICI therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207