A new extension of the two-parameter bathtub hazard shaped distribution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need of new life time distributions that can be used to fit real data sets is crucial in lifetime data analysis. This article uses the two parameter bathtub (TPBT) and the generalized exponential (GE) distributions to propose a new family of lifetime distributions, named the odd generalized exponential two-parameter bathtub shaped distribution (OGE-TPBT). Statistical properties of the proposed distribution are discussed. The maximum likelihood and Bayesian procedures are used to estimate the model’s parameters and some of its reliability measures. For Bayes method, we use three approaches of the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method. Simulation study is provided to investigate the properties of the methods applied. Based on some well know diagnostic tests, we find out that the simulation data provided in this paper is appropriate. To discuss the possible improvements of the new distribution compared to the original two distributions (GE and TPBT) and its applicability, a real-life data set is analyzed. Based on the comparison results, we found out that the OGE-TPBT fits the data better than both the GE and TPBT distributions. Also, we used the same real data set to compare the three approaches of the ABC. Based on the comparisons results of these three approaches, we recommend the naive ABC to approximate Bayes estimations in the situation for which there is no analytic solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it