MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4293575620 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628661

CALIFA, the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area survey

2016· article· en· W4293575620 on OpenAlexaff
S. F. Sánchez, R. García-Benito, S. Zibetti, C. J. Walcher, B. Husemann, M. A. Mendoza, L. Galbany, J. Falcón‐Barroso, D. Mast, J. Aceituno, J. A. L. Aguerri, J. Alves, A. Amorim, Y. Ascasíbar, J. K. Barrera-Ballesteros, S. Bekeraité, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, M. Cano-Díaz, R. Cid Fernandes, O. Cavichia, C. Cortijo-Ferrero, H. Dannerbauer, Markus Demleitner, Á. I. Díaz, R.‐J. Dettmar, A. de Lorenzo-Cáceres, A. del Olmo, A. Galazzi, B. García‐Lorenzo, A. Gil de Paz, R. M. González Delgado, Lewis Holmes, J. Iglésias-Páramo, C. Kehrig, Andreas Kelz, R. C. Kennicutt, B. Kleemann, E. A. D. Lacerda, Á. R. López-Sánchez, M. Lyubenova, R. A. Marino, I. Márquez, J. Méndez‐Abreu, M. Mollá, A. Monreal‐Ibero, R. Ortega Minakata, J. P. Torres-Papaqui, E. Pérez, F. F. Rosales-Ortega, Martin M. Roth, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, U. Schilling, Kristine Spekkens, N. Vale Asari, Remco C. E. van den Bosch, Glenn van de Ven, J. M. Vı́lchez, Vivienne Wild, L. Wisotzki, Akın Yıldırım, B. Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilDirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMax-Planck-GesellschaftInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaJunta de AndalucíaFP7 People: Marie-Curie ActionsMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadAgence Nationale de la RechercheConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorScience and Technology Facilities CouncilEuropean Commission
KeywordsPhysicsGalaxySpectrographAstrophysicsSpectral resolutionObservatoryRedshiftTelescopeAstronomyStellar populationWilliam Herschel TelescopeStar formationSpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the third public data release (DR3) of the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey. Science-grade quality data for 667 galaxies are made public, including the 200 galaxies of the second public data release (DR2). Data were obtained with the integral-field spectrograph PMAS/PPak mounted on the 3.5 m telescope at the Calar Alto Observatory. Three different spectral setups are available: i) a low-resolution V500 setup covering the wavelength range 3745–7500 Å (4240–7140 Å unvignetted) with a spectral resolution of 6.0 Å (FWHM) for 646 galaxies, ii) a medium-resolution V1200 setup covering the wavelength range 3650–4840 Å (3650–4620 Å unvignetted) with a spectral resolution of 2.3 Å (FWHM) for 484 galaxies, and iii) the combination of the cubes from both setups (called COMBO) with a spectral resolution of 6.0 Å and a wavelength range between 3700–7500 Å (3700–7140 Å unvignetted) for 446 galaxies. The Main Sample, selected and observed according to the CALIFA survey strategy covers a redshift range between 0.005 and 0.03, spans the color-magnitude diagram and probes a wide range of stellar masses, ionization conditions, and morphological types. The Extension Sample covers several types of galaxies that are rare in the overall galaxy population and are therefore not numerous or absent in the CALIFA Main Sample. All the cubes in the data release were processed using the latest pipeline, which includes improved versions of the calibration frames and an even further improved image reconstruction quality. In total, the third data release contains 1576 datacubes, including ~1.5 million independent spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations269
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207