Mapping the per-residue surface electrostatic potential of CAPRIN1 along its phase-separation trajectory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrostatic interactions and charge balance are important for the formation of biomolecular condensates involving proteins and nucleic acids. However, a detailed, atomistic picture of the charge distribution around proteins during the phase-separation process is lacking. Here, we use solution NMR spectroscopy to measure residue-specific near-surface electrostatic potentials ( ϕ ENS ) of the positively charged carboxyl-terminal intrinsically disordered 103 residues of CAPRIN1, an RNA-binding protein localized to membraneless organelles playing an important role in messenger RNA (mRNA) storage and translation. Measured ϕ ENS values have been mapped along the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)–induced phase-separation trajectory. In the absence of ATP, ϕ ENS values for the mixed state of CAPRIN1 are positive and large and progressively decrease as ATP is added. This is coupled to increasing interchain interactions, particularly between aromatic-rich and arginine-rich regions of the protein. Upon phase separation, CAPRIN1 molecules in the condensed phase are neutral ( ϕ ENS ≈ 0 mV), with ∼five molecules of ATP associated with each CAPRIN1 chain. Increasing the ATP concentration further inverts the CAPRIN1 electrostatic potential, so that molecules become negatively charged, especially in aromatic-rich regions, leading to re-entrance into a mixed phase. Our results collectively show that a subtle balance between electrostatic repulsion and interchain attractive interactions regulates CAPRIN1 phase separation and provides insight into how nucleotides, such as ATP, can induce formation of and subsequently dissolve protein condensates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".