MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Quartz and zircon in garnet elastic geobarometry of HP rocks from the Sesia Zone

2022· preprint· en· W4293660864 on OpenAlexaff
Giulia Mingardi, Mattia Gilio, Francesco Giuntoli, Kira Musiyachenko, Matteo Alvaro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenschistBlueschistEclogiteMetamorphic rockEpidoteGeologyGneissGeochemistryMetamorphic faciesZirconQuartzOrogenyMineralogySubductionFaciesGeomorphologySeismologyChlorite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sesia zone is a rifted portion of the Adriatic Margin that subducted to high-pressure conditions during the Alpine Orogeny. It consists of two main complexes: the Internal Complex (IC) and the External Complex (EC). The IC is made up of polymetamorphic micaschists, eclogites, and ortho-gneisses equilibrated at eclogite facies conditions; the EC consists of alpine monometamorphic orthogneiss with minor paragneiss and quartzites metamorphosed at epidote blueschist facies conditions and intensely retrogressed at greenschist facies conditions. The question is therefore to understand if we can trace the Alpine metamorphic history through methods that do not rely only on chemical equilibration. To tackle this objective, we used elastic geobarometry to derive pressure and temperature (P-T) conditions reached by three micaschists from the IC and one garnet-orthogneiss from the EC. Entrapment P obtained for the quartz inclusions in garnet in the IC range from 1.5-2 GPa at 600-650°C, in agreement with the P-T estimates determined through thermodynamic modelling. Coupled quartz and zircon in garnet geobarometry in the garnet-orthogneiss from the EC also display P-T conditions of 1.8 GPa and 650°C. These estimates disagree with the greenschist facies mineral assemblage of the rock (Ttn + Grt + Phg + Chl) and with the results of thermodynamic modelling (0.6-0.8 GPa and 500°C). The misfit in P-T estimates between elastic geobarometry and thermodynamic modelling might be due to an elastic reset of the quartz and zircon host-inclusion pairs at HP conditions. The use of coupled elastic geobarometry and thermodynamic modelling can help to unravel complex tectonometamorphic histories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→